Peter Kuma
Science and Software

Article

The Cold-Air Outbreaks in the Marine Boundary Layer Experiment model-observation intercomparison project (COMBLE-MIP) – Part 1: Model specification, observational constraints, and preliminary findings Open access

Timothy W. Juliano1, Florian Tornow2, 3, Ann M. Fridlind3, Andrew S. Ackerman3, Gregory S. Elsaesser2, 3, Bart Geerts4, Christian P. Lackner4, David Painemal5, Israel Silber6, Mikhail Ovchinnikov6, … Gunilla Svensson7, Michael Tjernström7, Peng Wu6, Alejandro Baró Pérez7, 8, Peter Bogenschutz18, Dmitry Chechin9, Kamal Kant Chandrakar1, Jan Chylik10, Andrey Debolskiy11, Rostislav Fadeev12, Anu Gupta13, Luisa Ickes8, Michail Karalis7, Martin Köhler14, Branko Kosović15, Peter Kuma16, 20, Weiwei Li1, Evgeny Mortikov11, Hugh Morrison1, Roel A. J. Neggers10, Anna Possner16, Tomi Raatikainen17, Lea Raillard19, 21, Sami Romakkaniemi17, Niklas Schnierstein10, Shin-ichiro Shima13, Nikita Silin11, Mikhail Tolstykh12, Étienne Vignon19, Lulin Xue1, Meng Zhang18, Xue Zheng18

1U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, CO, USA
2Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
3National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), New York, NY, USA
4University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA
5NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA
6Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA, USA
7Department of Meteorology and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
8Chalmers Technical University, Gothenburg, Sweden
9Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia
10University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
11Research Computing Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
12Institute of Numerical Mathematics (INM), RAS, and Hydrometcentre of Russia, Moscow, Russia
13Graduate School of Information Science, University of Hyogo, Kobe, Japan
14Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD), Offenbach am Main, Germany
15Ralph O’Connor Sustainable Energy Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
16Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
17Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
18Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA, USA
19Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique-IPSL, Sorbonne Université/CNRS/Ecole Normale Supérieure-PSL Université/Ecole Polytechnique-Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Paris, France
20Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI), Norrköping, Sweden and Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
21now at: Environmental Remote Sensing Laboratory, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Abstract

Models struggle to represent the coupled microphysical, turbulent and radiative processes within widespread, long-lived marine cold-air outbreak (CAO) cloud fields, contributing to forecast and climate biases. Here we combine ground-based and satellite measurements to initialize and constrain large-eddy simulations (LES) of cloud field evolution with distance downwind from the marginal ice zone during a strong, highly supercooled and convective CAO observed during the Cold-Air Outbreaks in the Marine Boundary Layer Experiment (COMBLE). LES results are compared with large-scale models run in single-column model (SCM) mode, providing an observation-constrained framework for large-scale model evaluation and future improvements. All models reproduce rapid cloud formation off the ice edge, and a monotonic ascent of downwind cloud-top heights, closely linked with time-integrated surface heat fluxes. LES generally reproduce domain-mean observational targets using a modest test domain (25×25 km2), and a larger domain (125×125 km2) enables better reproducing the observed growth of convective cell sizes. In realistic mixed-phase LES compared with liquid-only simulations, ice processes lead to thinner, broken cloud decks and substantially reduced cloud radiative effects on top-of-atmosphere longwave fluxes. By contrast, mixed-phase SCM simulations generally underpredict the radiative impact of ice, primarily owing to insufficient reduction of cloud cover. Results indicate that cellular cloud structure is qualitatively captured by LES, and thus LES could provide guidance to improvement of large-scale model physics schemes. Follow-on work will extend these results to larger domains, apply objective analysis of mesoscale structure, and include prognostic aerosol properties for droplet and heterogeneous ice formation.

Journal:
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume:
26
Issue:
18
Pages:
13267–13302
DOI:
10.5194/acp-26-13267-2026
Submitted:
1 April 2026
Accepted:
30 July 2026
Published:
22 September 2026
License:
Open access / Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)
Cite as:
Juliano, T. W., Tornow, F., Fridlind, A. M., Ackerman, A. S., Elsaesser, G. S., Geerts, B., Lackner, C. P., Painemal, D., Silber, I., Ovchinnikov, M., Svensson, G., Tjernström, M., Wu, P., Baró Pérez, A., Bogenschutz, P., Chechin, D., Chandrakar, K. K., Chylik, J., Debolskiy, A., … Zheng, X. (2026). The Cold-Air Outbreaks in the Marine Boundary Layer Experiment model-observation intercomparison project (COMBLE-MIP) – Part 1: Model specification, observational constraints, and preliminary findings. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 26(18), 13267–13302. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13267-2026
Juliano, T.W. et al. (2026) “The Cold-Air Outbreaks in the Marine Boundary Layer Experiment model-observation intercomparison project (COMBLE-MIP) – Part 1: Model specification, observational constraints, and preliminary findings,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 26(18), pp. 13267–13302. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13267-2026.
Juliano, Timothy W., Florian Tornow, Ann M. Fridlind, et al. “The Cold-Air Outbreaks in the Marine Boundary Layer Experiment Model-Observation Intercomparison Project (COMBLE-MIP) – Part 1: Model Specification, Observational Constraints, and Preliminary Findings.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 26, no. 18 (2026): 13267–302. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13267-2026.
Juliano, T. W., Tornow, F., Fridlind, A. M., Ackerman, A. S., Elsaesser, G. S., Geerts, B., et al. (2026). The Cold-Air Outbreaks in the Marine Boundary Layer Experiment model-observation intercomparison project (COMBLE-MIP) – Part 1: Model specification, observational constraints, and preliminary findings. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 26(18), 13267–13302. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13267-2026
Juliano, T. W., and Coauthors, 2026: The Cold-Air Outbreaks in the Marine Boundary Layer Experiment model-observation intercomparison project (COMBLE-MIP) – Part 1: Model specification, observational constraints, and preliminary findings. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 26, 13267–13302, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13267-2026.
Juliano, T. W., Tornow, F., Fridlind, A. M., Ackerman, A. S., Elsaesser, G. S., Geerts, B., Lackner, C. P., Painemal, D., Silber, I., Ovchinnikov, M., Svensson, G., Tjernström, M., Wu, P., Baró Pérez, A., Bogenschutz, P., Chechin, D., Chandrakar, K. K., Chylik, J., Debolskiy, A., Fadeev, R., Gupta, A., Ickes, L., Karalis, M., Köhler, M., Kosović, B., Kuma, P., Li, W., Mortikov, E., Morrison, H., Neggers, R. A. J., Possner, A., Raatikainen, T., Raillard, L., Romakkaniemi, S., Schnierstein, N., Shima, S.-ichiro, Silin, N., Tolstykh, M., Vignon, É., Xue, L., Zhang, M., and Zheng, X.: The Cold-Air Outbreaks in the Marine Boundary Layer Experiment model-observation intercomparison project (COMBLE-MIP) – Part 1: Model specification, observational constraints, and preliminary findings, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 26, 13267–13302, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13267-2026, 2026.

Document